³ÉÈËÓ°Òô

Schemes


Brexit impact

The operation of the UK takeover regime may be affected by Brexit. For the purposes of this topic area, the key change is the removal of the ability to passport a prospectus from the UK to the EEA, which may make schemes of arrangement more popular on securities exchange offers where there are offeree shareholders in the EEA. This is because it is generally accepted that the issue of new securities pursuant to a scheme of arrangement under the Companies Act 2006 will not constitute a public offer requiring a prospectus.

For further details on these and other issues, see Practice Note: Brexit—UK takeover regime.

Structuring a takeover—preliminary considerations

There are two primary methods of implementing a takeover of a UK public company:

  1. •

    by way of a contractual takeover offer under the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), s 974 (offer)

  2. •

    by way of a scheme of arrangement under CA 2006, Pt 26 (scheme)

While takeovers of a UK public company implemented under either structure are subject to the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code), the two structures possess fundamentally different

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Corporate News

High Court confirms broad government discretion in UK national security reviews

Competition analysis: In this judgment, the High Court issued its first ever ruling on a challenge to an unwinding order imposed by the UK government under the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (NSIA 2021). In a clear victory for the government, the court confirmed the broad discretion of the Secretary of State to determine the appropriate remedy for resolving national security concerns arising from a problematic transaction, up to and including forced divestment of the acquirer’s shareholding in a qualifying entity, as well confirming that the overall process followed by the Government in such cases is fair and proportionate. The judgment is also notable for the insights that it provides into the process followed by Government officials and ministers for in-depth reviews under the NSIA 2021, with the level of detail going well beyond what has been disclosed in the Government’s own guidance to date. Written by Becket McGrath, partner at Euclid Law Ltd.

Corporate weekly highlights—19 December 2024

This week's edition of Corporate weekly highlights includes: an FCA consultation on the regulatory framework for the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System (PISCES), FCA Primary Market Bulletin 53 containing a consultation on changes to technical and procedural notes in the FCA Knowledge Base following changes to the UK listing regime, The Companies (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment and Transitional Provision) Regulations 2024 which will increase financial thresholds for the purposes of certain Companies Act reporting requirements, news of the UK Sustainability Disclosure Technical Advisory Committee’s recommendation to endorse IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards, PERG publishing its 17th report on conformity with the Walker Guidelines, together with an amended version of the guidelines and ISS Governance publishing updates to its UK and Ireland proxy voting guidelines 2025.

Cabinet Office publishes assessment report on National Security and Investment Act

The Cabinet Office has released a report detailing the assessment and conclusions of the evaluation of the National Security and Investment Act (Notifiable Acquisition) (Specification of Qualifying Entities) Regulations 2021. This review provides insights into the government's analysis of the current regulatory framework and its implications for national security considerations in the context of credible entity acquisitions.

FRC publishes UK TAC endorsement recommendations for IFRS S1 and S2

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has published the UK Sustainability Disclosure Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)’s final recommendations to the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, Jonathan Reynolds, endorsing IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information (IFRS S1) and IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures (IFRS S2). The TAC’s technical assessment concluded that the endorsement of IFRS S1 and S2 would benefit the long-term public good in the UK. While most requirements were maintained without alteration, the TAC proposed minor amendments to IFRS S1, including extending the 'climate first' reporting relief for up to two years. It also recommended that the UK Sustainability Disclosure Policy and Implementation Committee develop guidance to clarify how entities can align IFRS S1 with existing sustainability-related disclosure requirements under the UK's current legal framework. In addition, it proposed amending IFRS S2's requirement on the use of the Global Industry Classification Standard for disaggregating financed emissions.

View Corporate by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Takeover Code—Rule 21—Restrictions on frustrating action

Takeover Code—Rule 21—Restrictions on frustrating actionThis Resource Note outlines the main provisions of Rule 21 of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code), which deals with the restrictions on an offeror taking frustrating action in relation to an offer and entering into inducement fee and

Acting in concert

Acting in concertSTOP PRESS—Impact of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023: This document contains references to retained EU law (REUL) and associated terms introduced by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 in connection with Brexit. From 1 January 2024, REUL that remains in

Takeover Code—Rule 34—Right of withdrawal

Takeover Code—Rule 34—Right of withdrawalThis Resource Note outlines the main provisions of Rule 34 of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code), which deals with shareholder withdrawal rights on takeover transactions. It highlights relevant materials, commentary and guidance from the Panel, as

Takeovers—cash confirmation requirements

Takeovers—cash confirmation requirementsIt is a fundamental concept of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code) that an offeror should announce a firm intention to make an offer only after the most careful and responsible consideration and when it has every reason to believe that it can and
Takeover Code—Rule 21—Restrictions on frustrating action

Takeover Code—Rule 21—Restrictions on frustrating action

Takeover Code—Rule 21—Restrictions on frustrating actionThis Resource Note outlines the main provisions of Rule 21 of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code), which deals with the restrictions on an offeror taking frustrating action in relation to an offer and entering into inducement fee and

Acting in concert

Acting in concert

Acting in concertSTOP PRESS—Impact of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023: This document contains references to retained EU law (REUL) and associated terms introduced by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 in connection with Brexit. From 1 January 2024, REUL that remains in

Takeover Code—Rule 34—Right of withdrawal

Takeover Code—Rule 34—Right of withdrawal

Takeover Code—Rule 34—Right of withdrawalThis Resource Note outlines the main provisions of Rule 34 of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code), which deals with shareholder withdrawal rights on takeover transactions. It highlights relevant materials, commentary and guidance from the Panel, as

Takeovers—cash confirmation requirements

Takeovers—cash confirmation requirements

Takeovers—cash confirmation requirementsIt is a fundamental concept of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code) that an offeror should announce a firm intention to make an offer only after the most careful and responsible consideration and when it has every reason to believe that it can and