Ӱ

Home / De-Voil / Part V17 Customs duties / Division V17.3 Cases and tribunal decisions / C00100 Anchor Foods Limited v C & E Comrs
Commentary

C00100 Anchor Foods Limited v C & E Comrs

Part V17 Customs duties

[1999] V & DR 1

Customs duty - refusal of Commissioners to accept level of securities offered by appellant prior to hearing - whether tribunal's jurisdiction appellate or supervisory - factors to be considered in arriving at level of security required - consistency with EC legislation

AF appealed against post-clearance demands for customs duty totalling over £260 million. On the basis that the provision of greater security would cause AF “hardship”, AF offered the Commissioners security amounting to £4.85 million. The Commissioners considered that this offer was inadequate and refused to issue a certificate, pursuant to FA 1994 s 16(3)(a), that appropriate security had been provided to enable the appeal to be entertained. AF made applications, pursuant to FA 1994 s 16(3)(b),

To continue reading
View the latest version of this document, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to TolleyLibrary or register for a free trial

Web page updated on 24 Aug 2024 13:24