³ÉÈËÓ°Òô

Legal News

Construction weekly highlights—1 August 2024

Published on: 01 August 2024

Table of contents

  • Adjudication
  • Sub-contractor’s claims against contractor were not settled by a CVA (Henry Construction v ProMEP)
  • Litigation
  • Claim for introducer fees to proceed to trial despite various challenges (Matrix Receivables Ltd v Musst Holdings Ltd)
  • Arbitration
  • Blog post—Arbitration statistics 2023: rising caseloads and repeat appointments
  • Procurement in construction
  • CCS publishes information on ‘call-off’ in procurement
  • Construction industry news
  • CITB announces Consensus consultation for 2026–29 Levy proposals
  • More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.

Article summary

This week's edition of Construction weekly highlights includes a case in which the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) rejected arguments that a sub-contractor’s claims were compromised in a company voluntary arrangement and that an adjudicator's decision had been procured by fraud (Henry Construction v ProMEP), a case in which the court considered an application for reverse summary judgment with regard to breach of contract and unjust enrichment (Matrix Receivables v Musst Holdings), publication of the seventh annual survey of international arbitration statistics by the ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô Arbitration Blog, and guidance published by the Crown Commercial Service (CCS) on the meaning of ‘call-off’ in procurement.

Popular documents