More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.
Dispute Resolution analysis: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform dispute resolution, promising to drive efficiencies and reduce costs. As the influence of AI in in the law is rapidly growing, so too does the need to balance its associated opportunities with the risks it is likely to pose to reliability, accountability, privacy and ethics. The purpose of this article is to explore the evolving role of AI in dispute resolution, its benefits, its limitations and the need for thought to be given as to how to mitigate the risks that it could potentially raise. Written by Rebecca Warder, Head of Knowledge Management, Hausfeld & Co, Lucy Pert, Co-Head of Commercial Disputes and Partner, Hausfeld & Co and Edward Nyman, Senior Associate, Hausfeld & Co.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô or register for a free trial
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN CONTINUE READING GET A QUOTE
To read the full news article, register for a free Lexis+ trial
**Trials are provided to all ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
* denotes a required field
Witness statements—substantive contentThis Practice Note provides general guidance for drafting witness statements of fact under CPR Part 32 in civil proceedings. In particular, it deals with what should be covered in witness statements and the courts’ approach to them, using the witness’ own words
Expert reportsThis Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further Court specific guidance below.Preparation of
When an extension of time to file a witness statement has been agreed, can the other party get a further extension of time?CPR 3.8(4) provides:‘In the circumstances referred to in paragraph (3) and unless the court orders otherwise, the time for doing the act in question may be extended by prior
Dispute Resolution analysis: In a rare successful application to set aside an arbitral award made in an ad hoc arbitration for serious irregularity under section 68(2) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996), the High Court found that a failure to cross-examine a witness on a ‘core issue’ left the
0330 161 1234