62 Compensation for owner of fishing rights applying under section 55
Water Resources Act 1991 (1991 c 57) | Legislation

62  Compensation for owner of fishing rights applying under section 55

(1)     Where a licence is revoked or varied on an application under section 55 above, the applicant shall be entitled to compensation from the [appropriate agency] in respect of the loss or damage which he has sustained as mentioned in subsection (3) of that section.

(2)     Where, on an application under section 55 above for the revocation or variation of a licence, the Secretary of State determines—

(a)     that the grounds of the application (as mentioned in subsection (3) of that section) have been established to his satisfaction; but

(b)     that the licence shall not be revoked or varied in pursuance of that application,

he shall certify accordingly for the purposes of the following provisions of this section.

(3)     Unless within the period of six months from the date on

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS)

Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS)What is QOCS?Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) was introduced on 1 April 2013 as part of the Jackson costs reforms following the removal of a claimant’s right to recover additional liabilities from the defendant, ie success fees and after the event (ATE)

LEXISNEXIS

Unless orders

Unless ordersThis Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further below.This Practice Note provides guidance on

LEXISNEXIS

Acknowledgment of service

Acknowledgment of serviceThis Practice Note explains when an acknowledgment of service is required (CPR 10) and the consequences of a failure to file an acknowledgment of service. It identifies the correct form to use, what information must be included and who must to sign the form. The different

LEXISNEXIS

Nuisance and the rule in Rylands v Fletcher—common law liability for pollution

Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not