[151J Purchase and resale arrangements]
Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (1992 c 12) | Legislation

[Arrangements that are alternative finance arrangements]

[151J  Purchase and resale arrangements]

[(1)     This section applies to arrangements if—

(a)     they are entered into between two persons (“the first purchaser” and “the second purchaser”), [and—

(i)     at least one of those persons is a financial institution, or

(ii)     the arrangements are regulated electronic system facilitated arrangements, and]

(b)     under the arrangements—

(i)     the first purchaser purchases an asset and sells it to the second purchaser,

(ii)     the sale occurs immediately after the purchase or in the circumstances mentioned in subsection (2),

(iii)     all or part of the

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Schemes of arrangement—procedure

Schemes of arrangement—procedureProduced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice.This Practice Note looks at the detailed procedures to be followed to implement the acquisition by a buyer (offeror) of all the shares, or one or more classes of shares, in a company

LEXISNEXIS

In a business-to-business contract where a contractual long-stop date has passed but the parties wish to

In a business-to-business contract where a contractual long-stop date has passed but the parties wish to continue with the contract, should they document their intention to continue or enter into a new contract?Long-stop dateAs stated in the Drafting Notes to clause: Long-stop date definition, the

LEXISNEXIS

Control of asbestos—duty to manage

The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 (CAR 2012) place various duties on employers to protect employees from risks related to exposure to asbestos and make it clear that these duties, so far as is reasonably practicable, are also owed to any other person, whether at work or not, who may be

LEXISNEXIS

Indirect effect of EU law

Indirect effect of EU lawWhat is indirect effect of EU law?The doctrine of indirect effect, or consistent interpretation, is a duty that national courts have, as part of the Member State responsible for fulfilment of EU obligations, to interpret national law in light of EU law, especially with