[171ZS Part 12ZB: supplementary]
Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 (1992 c 4) | Legislation

[171ZS  Part 12ZB: supplementary]

[(1)     In this Part of this Act—

“adoption pay period” has the meaning given by section 171ZN(2) above;

“the Board” means the Commissioners of Inland Revenue;

[“employer”, in relation to a person who is an employee, means a person who—

(a)     under section 6 above is liable to pay secondary Class 1 contributions in relation to any of the earnings of the person who is an employee; or

(b)     would be liable to pay such contributions but for—

(ii)     the condition in section 6(1)(b), or

(ii)     the employee being under the age of 16;]

[“local authority” has the same meaning as in the Children Act 1989 (see section 105(1) of that Act);]

[“local authority foster parent” has the same meaning as in the Children Act 1989 (see [section 105(1)] of that Act);]

“modifications” includes additions, omissions and amendments, and related expressions are to be read accordingly;

“prescribed” means prescribed by regulations.

(2)     In this Part of this Act, “employee” means a person who is—

(a)     gainfully employed in Great Britain

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Serving outside the jurisdiction with court permission—application and order

This Practice Note addresses issues when serving out of the jurisdiction and the permission of the court is required. It explains how to make an application and the form of order required. An application to serve out of the jurisdiction is generally made without notice and on the papers. Key

LEXISNEXIS

Recklessness in criminal cases

Recklessness in criminal casesWhat is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House

LEXISNEXIS

Standard of care in professional negligence claims

Standard of care in professional negligence claimsThis Practice Note considers the standard of care in professional negligence claims, originally formulated in Bolam v Friern Hospital as being that of reasonable skill and care but now reconsidered following Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health. It

LEXISNEXIS

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and