349 Making of sexual harm prevention order: effect on other orders
Sentencing Act 2020 (2020 c 17) | Legislation

349  Making of sexual harm prevention order: effect on other orders

(1)     Where a court makes a sexual harm prevention order in relation to an offender who is already subject to—

(a)     a sexual harm prevention order, or

(b)

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Recklessness in criminal cases

Recklessness in criminal casesWhat is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House

LEXISNEXIS

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent misrepresentation, unless the representor can prove they had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be true. If the representor had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be

LEXISNEXIS

Negligent misstatement—defences and remedies

Negligent misstatement—defences and remediesThere are a number of ways in which liability for negligent misstatement may be avoided and/or limited. For details on founding a claim of negligent misstatement, see Practice Note: Negligent misstatement—founding a claim.For guidance generally on clauses

LEXISNEXIS

Indirect effect of EU law

Indirect effect of EU lawWhat is indirect effect of EU law?The doctrine of indirect effect, or consistent interpretation, is a duty that national courts have, as part of the Member State responsible for fulfilment of EU obligations, to interpret national law in light of EU law, especially with