6 Restricting the presumption to be allowed in support of claims herein provided for
Prescription Act 1832 (1832 c 71) | Legislation

6  Restricting the presumption to be allowed in support of claims herein provided for

. . . In the several cases mentioned in and provided

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ rule

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleCosts determination and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleAn issue for practitioners is whether correspondence marked ‘without prejudice’ can be used against a party when the court comes to determine the issue of costs. The Court of Appeal in Walker v Wilsher (1889)

LEXISNEXIS

Recklessness in criminal cases

Recklessness in criminal casesWhat is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House

LEXISNEXIS

Sentencing fraud offences committed by individuals

Sentencing fraud offences committed by individualsThe Sentencing Council (SC) has produced sentencing guidelines for fraud offences under the Fraud Act 2006 (fraud by false representation, fraud by failing to disclose information and fraud by abuse of position), false accounting under section 17 of

LEXISNEXIS

Collective investment schemes—essentials

Collective investment schemes—essentialsThis Practice Note examines the definition of a collective investment scheme (CIS) and available exemptions, and the treatment of regulated and unregulated CIS.Definition of a collective investment schemeThe definition of a CIS is contained in section 235 of