Part 3 Variation of Order by Court in England and Wales
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 (2022 c 32) | Legislation

Part 3 Variation of Order by Court in England and Wales

6

After section 136ZF of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (inserted by paragraph 4) insert—

“136ZG Variation, renewal or discharge of sexual harm prevention order made in Scotland by court in England and Wales

(1)     This section applies where a relevant Scottish order has been made in respect of a person (“the defendantâ€) who now—

(a)     is residing in England and Wales, or

(b)     is in or is intending to come to England and Wales.

(2)     In this section “relevant Scottish order†means a sexual harm prevention order made under section 11 or 12 of the Abusive Behaviour and Sexual Harm (Scotland) Act 2016 (asp 22).

(3)     A person within subsection (4) may by complaint to the appropriate court apply for an order varying, renewing or discharging the relevant order.

(4)     Those persons are—

(a)     the defendant;

(b)     the chief officer of police for the area in which the defendant resides;

(c)     a chief officer of police who believes that the defendant is in, or is intending to come to, that officer's police area.

(5)     If a list has been published under section 172 of the Police,

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Enforcing a warrant of control

Enforcing a warrant of controlThis Practice Note has been produced by enforcement specialists, The Sheriffs Office. It guides users through the process of enforcing a warrant of control obtained from the County Court as a method of enforcing a money judgment; whereby the judgment creditor takes

LEXISNEXIS

Malus and clawback

Malus and clawbackFORTHCOMING CHANGE: On 18 March 2021, it was announced that the government was launching a consultation on wide-ranging reforms to modernise the country’s audit and corporate governance regime, targeting the UK’s biggest businesses and ensuring markets work effectively. In relation

LEXISNEXIS

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ rule

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleCosts determination and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleAn issue for practitioners is whether correspondence marked ‘without prejudice’ can be used against a party when the court comes to determine the issue of costs. The Court of Appeal in Walker v Wilsher (1889)

LEXISNEXIS

Fraud by false representation

Fraud by false representationFraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the