25 Revocation of interim suspension orders
Osteopaths Act 1993 (1993 c 21) | Legislation

25  Revocation of interim suspension orders

(1)     On an application made by the osteopath concerned, in a case falling within section 24(1)(a), an interim suspension order may be revoked by the Committee which made it on the ground that a change in the circumstances of the case has made the order unnecessary.

(2)     Where an osteopath has made an application under subsection (1) which has been refused, he may appeal to the appropriate court against the refusal.

(3)     Where, in relation to

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Pre-trial and case management hearings in the Crown Court

Pre-trial and case management hearings in the Crown CourtCoronavirus (COVID-19): This Practice Note contains guidance on subjects impacted by the Coronavirus Act 2020 (CA 2020). CA 2020, among other measures, makes provision for the extended use of live links and audio links in criminal proceedings.

LEXISNEXIS

Recklessness in criminal cases

Recklessness in criminal casesWhat is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House

LEXISNEXIS

VAT definition

LEXISNEXIS

Negligent misstatement—defences and remedies

Negligent misstatement—defences and remediesThere are a number of ways in which liability for negligent misstatement may be avoided and/or limited. For details on founding a claim of negligent misstatement, see Practice Note: Negligent misstatement—founding a claim.For guidance generally on clauses