121 Notices to deal with terrorism content or CSEA content (or both)
Online Safety Act 2023 (2023 c 50) | Legislation

Chapter 5
Regulated User-to-User Services and Regulated Search Services: Notices to Deal with Terrorism Content and CSEA Content

121  Notices to deal with terrorism content or CSEA content (or both)

(1)     If OFCOM consider that it is necessary and proportionate to do so, they may give a notice described in subsection (2), (3) or (4) relating to a regulated user-to-user service or a regulated search service to the provider of the service.

(2)     A notice under subsection (1) that relates to a regulated user-to-user service is a notice requiring the provider of the service—

(a)     to do any or all of the following—

(i)     use accredited technology to identify terrorism content communicated publicly by means of the service and to swiftly take down that content;

(ii)     use accredited technology to prevent individuals from encountering terrorism content communicated publicly by means of the service;

(iii)     use accredited technology to identify CSEA content, whether communicated publicly or privately by means of the service, and to swiftly take down that content;

(iv)     use accredited technology to prevent individuals from encountering CSEA content, whether communicated

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Malus and clawback

Malus and clawbackFORTHCOMING CHANGE: On 18 March 2021, it was announced that the government was launching a consultation on wide-ranging reforms to modernise the country’s audit and corporate governance regime, targeting the UK’s biggest businesses and ensuring markets work effectively. In relation

LEXISNEXIS

Transferred malice

Transferred maliceThe principle of transferred maliceIf a person has a malicious intent towards X and, in carrying out that intent, injures Y, he is guilty of an offence. So, if D shoots at A with intent to kill him but kills B by mistake it is murder; the mistake as to the identity of the victim is

LEXISNEXIS

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent misrepresentation, unless the representor can prove they had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be true. If the representor had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be

LEXISNEXIS

Possession of a bladed article

Possession of a bladed articleThe offence of possession of a bladed articleThe offence of having a bladed article in a public place can be tried in either the magistrates' court or the Crown Court. The magistrates' court will decline jurisdiction in those cases where it appears that its powers of