17 Retrospective validation of notifiable acquisition following call-in
National Security and Investment Act 2021 (2021 c 25) | Legislation

17  Retrospective validation of notifiable acquisition following call-in

(1)     This section applies where the Secretary of State has given a call-in notice pursuant to—

(a)     subsection (2)(a) of section 15, or

(b)     subsection (7)(b)(i) of section 16,

(and, accordingly, the trigger event to which the call-in notice relates is,

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ rule

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleCosts determination and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleAn issue for practitioners is whether correspondence marked ‘without prejudice’ can be used against a party when the court comes to determine the issue of costs. The Court of Appeal in Walker v Wilsher (1889)

LEXISNEXIS

Common assault and battery

Common assault and batteryThe offences of common assault and batteryTechnically, the offences of assault and battery are separate summary offences. An assault is committed when the defendant intentionally or recklessly causes another to apprehend immediate and unlawful violence and battery is

LEXISNEXIS

Possession of a bladed article

Possession of a bladed articleThe offence of possession of a bladed articleThe offence of having a bladed article in a public place can be tried in either the magistrates' court or the Crown Court. The magistrates' court will decline jurisdiction in those cases where it appears that its powers of

LEXISNEXIS

Indirect effect of EU law

Indirect effect of EU lawWhat is indirect effect of EU law?The doctrine of indirect effect, or consistent interpretation, is a duty that national courts have, as part of the Member State responsible for fulfilment of EU obligations, to interpret national law in light of EU law, especially with