Part 5 Review of Detention under section 27
National Security Act 2023 (2023 c 32) | Legislation

Part 5 Review of Detention under section 27

Requirement

29

(1)     A person's detention must be periodically reviewed by a review officer.

(2)     The first review must be carried out as soon as is reasonably practicable after the time of the person's arrest.

(3)     Subsequent reviews must be carried out at intervals of not more than 12 hours.

This is subject to paragraph 30.

(4)     A person's detention may not be reviewed after a warrant has been issued under Part 6 of this Schedule extending the detention period.

Postponement

30

(1)     A review may be postponed if, at the latest time at which it may be carried out in accordance with paragraph 29—

(a)     the detained person is being questioned by a constable and the review officer is satisfied that an interruption of the questioning to carry out the review would prejudice the investigation in connection with which the person is being detained,

(b)     no review officer is readily available, or

(c)     it is not practicable for any other reason to carry out the review.

(2)     Where a review is postponed it must be carried out as soon as is reasonably practicable.

(3)     For the

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Direct discrimination

Direct discriminationIP COMPLETION DAY: 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020 marks the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period entered into following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. At this point in time (referred to in UK law as ‘IP completion day’), key transitional arrangements come to an

LEXISNEXIS

179. List of offences triable either way.

  Without prejudice to any other enactment by virtue of which any offence is triable either way1, the following offences are triable either way2:  (1)     offences at common law of public nuisance3;  (2)     an offence at common law of

LEXISNEXIS

Standard of care in professional negligence claims

Standard of care in professional negligence claimsThis Practice Note considers the standard of care in professional negligence claims, originally formulated in Bolam v Friern Hospital as being that of reasonable skill and care but now reconsidered following Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health. It

LEXISNEXIS

Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claim

Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claimNegligence—what are the key ingredients to establish a claim in negligence?For liability in negligence to be founded, four key ingredients must be present:•duty of care•breach of that duty•damage (which is caused by the breach)•foreseeability of