Part 1 Consequential Provision
Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (2012 c 10) | Legislation

SCHEDULE 21 Abolition of Certain Sentences for Dangerous Offenders and New Extended Sentences: Consequential and Transitory Provision

Section 126

Part 1 Consequential Provision

Juries Act 1974 (c 23)

1

In Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Juries Act 1974 (persons disqualified from jury service) in paragraph 6(d), before “227†insert “226A, 226B,â€.

Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (c 53)

2

In section 5 of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (sentences excluded from rehabilitation under that Act), in subsection (1)(f), before “227†insert “226A, 226B,â€.

Criminal Justice Act 1982 (c 48)

3

In section 32 of the Criminal Justice Act 1982 (early release of prisoners), in subsection (1)(a), before “227†insert “226A orâ€.

Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 (c 53)

4

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Novation—why and how to novate a contract

Novation—why and how to novate a contractThere may be times when, rather than assigning the benefit of an agreement to a third party, the original parties wish instead to end their obligations to each other under that agreement and, in effect, recreate it, with the third party stepping into the

LEXISNEXIS

Specific performance of property agreements

If a party to a property agreement fails to comply with its obligations, the other party may wish to apply for an order for specific performance. Specific performance is an equitable, discretionary remedy which, if granted, compels a party to perform a contractual obligation. This Practice Note

LEXISNEXIS

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent misrepresentation, unless the representor can prove they had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be true. If the representor had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be

LEXISNEXIS

No deal Brexit—jurisdiction (UK and the Lugano Convention) [Archived]

No deal Brexit—jurisdiction (UK and the Lugano Convention) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note has been produced in partnership with Guy Pendell, Liz Williams and Kushal Gandhi of CMS.This Practice Note covers the situation where the UK