Part 5 Equipment Interference
Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (2016 c 25) | Legislation

Part 5 Equipment Interference

Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000

64

The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 is amended as follows.

65

In section 48 (interpretation of Part 2), in subsection (3)(c)—

(a)     omit the “or†at the end of sub-paragraph (i);

(b)     after sub-paragraph (ii) insert “; or

(iii)     Part 5, or Chapter 3 of Part 6, of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (equipment interference).â€

66

(1)     Paragraph 2 of Schedule 2 (persons having the appropriate permission where data obtained under warrant etc) is amended as follows.

(2)     In sub-paragraph (1)—

(a)     omit the “or†at the end of paragraph (a);

(b)     after paragraph (b) insert “; or

(c)     a targeted equipment interference warrant issued under section 106 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (powers of law enforcement chiefs to issue warrants to law enforcement officers).â€

(3)     In sub-paragraph (5), at the end insert “or under a targeted

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Novation—why and how to novate a contract

Novation—why and how to novate a contractThere may be times when, rather than assigning the benefit of an agreement to a third party, the original parties wish instead to end their obligations to each other under that agreement and, in effect, recreate it, with the third party stepping into the

LEXISNEXIS

Common law offence of false imprisonment

Common law offence of false imprisonmentThe offence of false imprisonmentFalse imprisonment is a common law offence but it is more common as a civil action in tort (see Practice Note: False imprisonment).It is triable only on indictment. It may be classified in class 2A, 2B or 3 in accordance with

LEXISNEXIS

Public inquiry procedure

Public inquiry procedureThe procedure by which a public inquiry is conducted will vary significantly from one inquiry to the next. Even for inquiries established under the Inquiries Act 2005 (IA 2005), the associated inquiry rules are not particularly prescriptive as to how they ought to be

LEXISNEXIS

Fraud by false representation

Fraud by false representationFraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the