Part 5 Penalties: Assessment etc
Finance Act 2012 (2012 c 14) | Legislation

Part 5 Penalties: Assessment etc

Assessment of penalties

29

(1)     If a person becomes liable to a penalty under Part 3 or 4 of this Schedule, HMRC may assess the penalty.

(2)     But, in the case of a penalty under Part 4, they may only do so if a conduct notice has been given to the person and either—

(a)     the time allowed for giving notice of appeal against the determination has expired without notice of appeal being given, or

(b)     notice of appeal against the determination was given within the time allowed, but the appeal has been withdrawn or the determination confirmed.

(3)     Paragraph 7(4) applies for the purposes of sub-paragraph (2)(b).

(4)     If HMRC assess a penalty, they must notify the person.

30

(1)     HMRC may not assess a penalty under this Schedule after the applicable deadline.

(2)     For a penalty under Part 3, the applicable deadline is the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which the person became liable to the penalty.

(3)     For a penalty under Part 4, the applicable deadline is the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the later of—

(a)

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Motor claims in the Portal—a practical guide (Stage 1)

Motor claims in the Portal—a practical guide (Stage 1)The Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents—30 April 2013 onwardsSTOP PRESS: A new RTA small claims protocol for whiplash claims comes into effect for accidents occurring on or after 31 May 2021. The

LEXISNEXIS

Third party rights—the common law doctrine of privity of contract

Third party rights—the common law doctrine of privity of contractThis Practice Note discusses the common law doctrine of privity of contract; the equitable and statutory exceptions to it; how the doctrine affects enforcing a contract against a third party and what happens when, notwithstanding the

LEXISNEXIS

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ rule

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleCosts determination and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleAn issue for practitioners is whether correspondence marked ‘without prejudice’ can be used against a party when the court comes to determine the issue of costs. The Court of Appeal in Walker v Wilsher (1889)

LEXISNEXIS

A chargor (an individual) is granting a legal charge to a chargee (a company). Can an employee of the

There does not appear to be any evidence that an employee of the chargee cannot witness the chargor’s signature.Practice Note: Property deeds—use and execution of deeds in property transactions, provides guidance on who may witness the signature of a deed by an individual:‘There are certain