14 Incidental orders
Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985 (1985 c 37) | Legislation

14  Incidental orders

(1)     Subject to subsection (3) below, an incidental order may be made under section 8(2) of this Act before, on or after the granting or refusal of decree of divorce [or of dissolution of a civil partnership].

(2)     In this Act, “an incidental order” means one or more of the following orders—

(a)     an order for the sale of property;

(b)     an order for the valuation of property;

(c)     an order determining any dispute between the parties to the marriage[, or as the case may be the partners,] as to their respective property rights by means of a declarator thereof or otherwise;

(d)     an order regulating the occupation of—

[(i)]     the matrimonial home[, or

(ii)     the family home of the partnership,]

or the use of furniture and plenishings therein or excluding either [person] from such occupation;

(e)     an order regulating liability, as between the [persons], for outgoings in respect of—

[(i)]     the matrimonial home[, or

(ii)     the family home of the partnership,]

or furniture or plenishings therein;

(f)     an order that security shall be given for any financial provision;

(g)     an order that payments shall be made or property transferred

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Pre-trial and case management hearings in the Crown Court

Pre-trial and case management hearings in the Crown CourtCoronavirus (COVID-19): This Practice Note contains guidance on subjects impacted by the Coronavirus Act 2020 (CA 2020). CA 2020, among other measures, makes provision for the extended use of live links and audio links in criminal proceedings.

LEXISNEXIS

Directors’ remuneration

Directors’ remunerationCompany directors are not, by virtue only of their office as director, automatically entitled under company law to remuneration for services as a director or to reimbursement of expenses incurred in rendering such services. Power to pay directors remuneration for their

LEXISNEXIS

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ rule

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleCosts determination and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleAn issue for practitioners is whether correspondence marked ‘without prejudice’ can be used against a party when the court comes to determine the issue of costs. The Court of Appeal in Walker v Wilsher (1889)

LEXISNEXIS

Criminal damage

Criminal damageGeneralSimple criminal damage is triable either way unless the value of the alleged damage is £5,000 or less, in which case the offence will be treated as if it were triable only summarily.Where the damage is caused by fire or the racially aggravated form of the offence is charged,