Part 4 Interpretation and Transitional and Transitory Provision
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (2013 c 24) | Legislation

Part 4 Interpretation and Transitional and Transitory Provision

Interpretation

59

(1)     In this Schedule, “enactment†means—

(a)     an enactment contained in this or any other Act;

(b)     an enactment comprised in subordinate legislation within the meaning of the Interpretation Act 1978;

(c)     an enactment contained in, or in an instrument made under, an Act of the Scottish Parliament;

(d)     a Measure or Act of the National Assembly for Wales;

(e)     an enactment contained in, or in an instrument made under, Northern Ireland legislation (within the meaning of the Interpretation Act 1978).

(2)     Any reference in this Schedule to an enactment includes a reference to an enactment whenever passed or made.

60

References in this Schedule to the commencement date are to the date on which section 25(3) comes into force.

Members of the Competition Commission

61

(1)     This paragraph applies—

(a)     in relation to any appointments under paragraph 1(1)(b) to the CMA panel that are made before the abolition of the

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Schemes of arrangement—procedure

Schemes of arrangement—procedureProduced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice.This Practice Note looks at the detailed procedures to be followed to implement the acquisition by a buyer (offeror) of all the shares, or one or more classes of shares, in a company

LEXISNEXIS

Proprietary estoppel

Proprietary estoppelThis Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice

LEXISNEXIS

Standard of care in professional negligence claims

Standard of care in professional negligence claimsThis Practice Note considers the standard of care in professional negligence claims, originally formulated in Bolam v Friern Hospital as being that of reasonable skill and care but now reconsidered following Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health. It

LEXISNEXIS

CPR Part 8 claims (alternative procedure for claims)

CPR Part 8 claims (alternative procedure for claims)This Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further