[174A Enforcement of powers under section 174: general] [imposition of penalties]
Enterprise Act 2002 (2002 c 40) | Legislation

[174A  Enforcement of powers under section 174: general] [imposition of penalties]

[(1)ÌýÌýÌýÌý Where the CMA considers that a person has, without reasonable excuse, failed to comply with any requirement of a notice under section 174, it may impose a penalty in accordance with section 174D.

[(1)ÌýÌýÌýÌý The CMA may impose a penalty on a person in accordance with section 174D where the CMA considers that—

(a)ÌýÌýÌýÌý the person has, without reasonable excuse, failed to comply with any requirement of a notice under section 174;

(b)ÌýÌýÌýÌý the person has, without reasonable excuse, obstructed or delayed another person in the exercise of the other person's powers under section 174(7);

(c)ÌýÌýÌýÌý the person has, without reasonable excuse, altered, suppressed or destroyed any document which the person has been required to produce by a notice under section 174.

(1A)ÌýÌýÌýÌý The relevant authority may impose a penalty on a person in accordance with section 174D where the authority considers that—

(a)ÌýÌýÌýÌý the person has, without reasonable excuse, supplied information that is false or misleading in a material respect to the

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Serving outside the jurisdiction with court permission—application and order

This Practice Note addresses issues when serving out of the jurisdiction and the permission of the court is required. It explains how to make an application and the form of order required. An application to serve out of the jurisdiction is generally made without notice and on the papers. Key

LEXISNEXIS

Specific performance of property agreements

If a party to a property agreement fails to comply with its obligations, the other party may wish to apply for an order for specific performance. Specific performance is an equitable, discretionary remedy which, if granted, compels a party to perform a contractual obligation. This Practice Note

LEXISNEXIS

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ rule

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleCosts determination and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleAn issue for practitioners is whether correspondence marked ‘without prejudice’ can be used against a party when the court comes to determine the issue of costs. The Court of Appeal in Walker v Wilsher (1889)

LEXISNEXIS

Introduction to passing off

Unlike many other countries, the UK has no unfair competition law. Brand owners seeking to prevent competitors from marketing ‘copycat’ products or using misleading advertising have to rely on a combination of different intellectual property rights. These rights include the common law right to