34 Indexation of amounts, &c
Employment Relations Act 1999 (1999 c 26) | Legislation

34  Indexation of amounts, &c

(1)     This section applies to the sums specified in the following provisions—

[(za)     section 27M(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (complaints about tips etc: compensation);

(zb)     section 27O(2) of that Act (complaints about information: compensation);]

(a)     section 31(1) of [that Act] (guarantee payments: limits);

(b)     section 120(1) of that Act (unfair dismissal: minimum amount of basic award);

(c)     section 124(1) of that Act (unfair dismissal: limit of compensatory award);

(d)     section 186(1)(a) and (b) of that Act (employee's rights on insolvency of employer: maximum amount payable);

(e)     section 227(1) of that Act (maximum amount of a week's pay for purposes of certain calculations);

[(ea)     section 145E(3)

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Direct discrimination

Direct discriminationIP COMPLETION DAY: 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020 marks the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period entered into following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. At this point in time (referred to in UK law as ‘IP completion day’), key transitional arrangements come to an

LEXISNEXIS

The supremacy of EU law

The supremacy of EU lawIP COMPLETION DAY: 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020 marks the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period entered into following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. At this point in time (referred to in UK law as ‘IP completion day’), key transitional arrangements come to an

LEXISNEXIS

Fraud by false representation

Fraud by false representationFraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the

LEXISNEXIS

Indirect effect of EU law

Indirect effect of EU lawWhat is indirect effect of EU law?The doctrine of indirect effect, or consistent interpretation, is a duty that national courts have, as part of the Member State responsible for fulfilment of EU obligations, to interpret national law in light of EU law, especially with