SCHEDULE 9 Repeals
Employment Relations Act 1999 (1999 c 26) | Legislation

SCHEDULE 9 Repeals

Section 44

1 Ballots and Notices

ChapterShort titleExtent of repeal
1992 c 52Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.In section 226(2) the word “and†at the end of paragraph (b).
Section 227(2).
In section 234A(7)(a) the words “otherwise than to enable the union to comply with a court order or an undertaking given to a courtâ€.

2 Leave for Family Reasons etc

ChapterShort titleExtent of repeal
1996 c 17Employment Tribunals Act 1996.In section 13(2)—
the word “or†after paragraph (a), paragraph (b), and the words “, or which she held before her absence,â€.
1996 c 18Employment Rights Act 1996.In section 37, subsection (4), the word “and†after subsection (5)(a), and subsection (5)(b).
In section 43, subsection (4), the word “and†after subsection (5)(a), and subsection (5)(b).
Section 96.
Section 97(6).
Section 98(5).
Section 105(2).
Section 108(3)(a).
Section 109(2)(a).
Section 114(5).
Section 115(4).
In section 118(1)(b), the word “, 127â€.
Section 119(6).
Section 127.
Section 137.
Section 145(7).
Section 146(3).
Section 156(2).
Section 157(6).
Section 162(7).
In section 199, the words “(subject to subsection (3)†in subsection
Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Enforcing a warrant of control

Enforcing a warrant of controlThis Practice Note has been produced by enforcement specialists, The Sheriffs Office. It guides users through the process of enforcing a warrant of control obtained from the County Court as a method of enforcing a money judgment; whereby the judgment creditor takes

LEXISNEXIS

Proprietary estoppel

Proprietary estoppelThis Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice

LEXISNEXIS

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ rule

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleCosts determination and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleAn issue for practitioners is whether correspondence marked ‘without prejudice’ can be used against a party when the court comes to determine the issue of costs. The Court of Appeal in Walker v Wilsher (1889)

LEXISNEXIS

PRA Rulebook—introduction for the insurance and reinsurance sector

PRA Rulebook—introduction for the insurance and reinsurance sectorOn 29 August 2015, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the PRA Rulebook (Rulebook). The transition from the Handbook to the Rulebook was intended to benefit PRA-authorised firms, to access clearer and more concise