92 Amendment and periodic review of drug treatment and testing orders
Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (1998 c 37) | Legislation

92  Amendment and periodic review of drug treatment and testing orders

After section 234D of the 1995 Act there shall be inserted the following sections—

“234E Amendment of drug treatment and testing order

(1)     Where a drug treatment and testing order is in force either the offender or the supervising officer may apply to the appropriate court for variation or revocation of the order.

(2)     Where an application is made under subsection (1) above by the supervising officer, the court shall issue a citation requiring the offender to appear before the court.

(3)     On an application made under subsection (1) above and after hearing both the offender and the supervising officer, the court may by order, if it appears to it in the interests of justice to do so—

(a)     vary the order by—

(i)     amending or deleting any of its requirements or provisions;

(ii)     inserting further requirements or provisions; or

(iii)     subject to subsection (4) below, increasing or decreasing the treatment and testing period; or

(b)     revoke the order.

(4)     The power conferred by subsection (3)(a)(iii) above shall not be exercised so as to increase the

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Transferred malice

Transferred maliceThe principle of transferred maliceIf a person has a malicious intent towards X and, in carrying out that intent, injures Y, he is guilty of an offence. So, if D shoots at A with intent to kill him but kills B by mistake it is murder; the mistake as to the identity of the victim is

LEXISNEXIS

Notice of assignment

notice of [assignment OR transfer]To: [insert name of landlord][of [insert address] OR whose registered office is at [insert address] Company number [insert number]][and][To: [insert name of head landlord]][of [insert address] OR whose registered office is at [insert address] Company number [insert

LEXISNEXIS

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent misrepresentation, unless the representor can prove they had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be true. If the representor had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be

LEXISNEXIS

The pari passu principle and collection remedies for the office-holder—the position under the Insolvency

The pari passu principle and collection remedies for the office-holder—the position under the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016The primary function of office-holders in personal and corporate insolvency is to collect in the assets belonging to a company or individual and to distribute these