110 Applications to the Ombudsman
Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (2005 c 4) | Legislation

Applications for review and references

110  Applications to the Ombudsman

(1)     This section applies if an interested party makes an application to the Ombudsman for the review of the exercise by any person of a regulated disciplinary function, on the grounds that there has been—

(a)     a failure to comply with prescribed procedures, or

(b)     some other maladministration.

(2)     The Ombudsman must carry out a review if the following three conditions are met.

(3)     The first condition is that the Ombudsman considers that a review is necessary.

(4)     The second condition is that—

(a)     the application is made

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

HCPC—Main hearing of the Health and Care Professions Tribunal

HCPC—Main hearing of the Health and Care Professions TribunalCoronavirus (COVID-19): This Practice Note contains guidance on subjects impacted by the government’s response to the coronavirus outbreak. In particular, the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Rules Order

LEXISNEXIS

Negligent misstatement—defences and remedies

Negligent misstatement—defences and remediesThere are a number of ways in which liability for negligent misstatement may be avoided and/or limited. For details on founding a claim of negligent misstatement, see Practice Note: Negligent misstatement—founding a claim.For guidance generally on clauses

LEXISNEXIS

Traditional procurement of construction contracts

Traditional procurement of construction contractsThis Practice Note provides a basic explanation of traditional procurement in construction. It looks at why this type of procurement is used and also considers particular issues to take into account when choosing to follow this procurement route.When

LEXISNEXIS

Indirect effect of EU law

Indirect effect of EU lawWhat is indirect effect of EU law?The doctrine of indirect effect, or consistent interpretation, is a duty that national courts have, as part of the Member State responsible for fulfilment of EU obligations, to interpret national law in light of EU law, especially with