[17ZB Young carers' needs assessments: supplementary]
Children Act 1989 (1989 c 41) | Legislation

[17ZB  Young carers' needs assessments: supplementary]

[(1)     This section applies for the purposes of section 17ZA.

(2)     “Parent”, in relation to a young carer, includes—

(a)     a parent of the young carer who does not have parental responsibility for the young carer, and

(b)     a person who is not a parent of the young carer but who has parental responsibility for the young carer.

(3)     A person is not a young carer if the person provides or intends to provide care—

(a)     under or by virtue of

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Enforcing a warrant of control

Enforcing a warrant of controlThis Practice Note has been produced by enforcement specialists, The Sheriffs Office. It guides users through the process of enforcing a warrant of control obtained from the County Court as a method of enforcing a money judgment; whereby the judgment creditor takes

LEXISNEXIS

Scotland: the Accountant in Bankruptcy

Scotland: the Accountant in BankruptcyThe office of the Accountant in Bankruptcy (AiB) was created by section 156 of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1856 . Previously, the functions of the AiB were limited but since 1993, with the enactment of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1993 (B(S)A 1993), the role

LEXISNEXIS

Subrogation in insurance and reinsurance

Subrogation in insurance and reinsuranceWhat is the right of subrogation?In the context of insurance and reinsurance, the right of subrogation entitles an insurer or reinsurer, having indemnified the (re)insured, to ‘step into its shoes’ to bring an action in the (re)insured’s name. For the purpose

LEXISNEXIS

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent misrepresentation, unless the representor can prove they had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be true. If the representor had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be