Causation and intervening acts in criminal cases

Published by a ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô Corporate Crime expert
Practice notes

Causation and intervening acts in criminal cases

Published by a ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô Corporate Crime expert

Practice notes
imgtext

Criminal offences are generally divided into two categories:

  1. •

    conduct crimes, and

  2. •

    result crimes

A conduct crime is a crime where only the forbidden conduct needs to be proved. For example, an accused is guilty of dangerous driving if they drove a motor vehicle dangerously on a road or other public place. There is no requirement to prove harmful consequences such as injury to another.

A result crime is a crime which causes or results in specified consequences. For example, Murder requires Proof that someone is killed.

For any result crime the prosecution must establish:

  1. •

    a factual link between the conduct of the accused and the result they are alleged to have caused (factual Causation), and

  2. •

    a sufficient cause in law between the conduct of the accused and the prohibited consequences (legal causation)

Factual causation is also known as ‘but for’ causation because it must be established that the result would not have occurred but for the actions of the accused.

If factual causation cannot be established the prosecution

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Key definition:
Causation definition
What does Causation mean?

Causation comprises the policy definitions on what in law constitutes a factual connection between an act and a consequence that in some way follows from that act.

Popular documents