Resolution Definition

Case studies

"It really is saving us a huge number of hours over the days, weeks and months. Having more relevant support at hand, not having to draft or review documents them from scratch - it all adds up."

Southampton FC

Access all documents on Resolution

GET ACCESS NOW

GLOSSARY

Published by a ��Ӱ�� Corporate expert

What does Resolution mean?

A proposal put forward to be decided upon at a meeting of the board of directors or of the shareholders of a company in general meeting. See also ordinary resolution, special resolution and written resolution.

Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

Checklist for compromises of FCA-regulated entities: information requirements

Checklist for compromises of FCA-regulated entities: information requirements The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is the conduct regulator for financial services firms and financial markets in the United Kingdom. It has a duty under section 1B of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000) to pursue certain objectives, one of which is the consumer protection objective. The FCA lists its statutory objectives as to secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers and to protect and enhance the integrity of UK financial markets, with a view to reducing the number of proposed compromises that they do not consider to be appropriate (see FG22/4, para 1.2). On 5 July 2022, the FCA published guidance on compromises of regulated firms (see FCA Guidance FG22/4 July 2022 and updated in January 2024) following their significant concerns about these tools being proposed and used by firms to avoid paying customers redress (see: LNB News 05/07/2022 72). Practitioners will need to take note of the guidance where the proposed compromise involves regulated companies, meaning...

MVNO agreement—checklist

MVNO agreement—checklist This Checklist covers some of the main provisions to be included in a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) agreement under which a mobile network operator supplier will provide wholesale access services to an MVNO for resale to its own retail customers. It covers some of the main provisions that are specific to an agreement of this kind. See also the Precedent: MVNO agreement. In this Checklist, the following definitions are used: • Agreement—means the MVNO agreement between the MVNO and the Supplier for the provision of the Services • End-User—means a customer of the MVNO • IPR—means intellectual property rights • MVNO—means mobile virtual network operator, the customer in the Agreement • Services—means the wholesale network services being provided to the MVNO by the Supplier • Supplier—means the mobile network operator providing network services to the MVNO The third column can be used to record observations or comments as the Checklist is worked through. Checklist Further information Notes (if any) General terms and conditions ☐ Consider duration....

Discover our 406 Checklists on Resolution

Ireland—Civil court structure—flowchart

Ireland—Civil court structure—flowchart This Flowchart provides a simple diagrammatic illustration of the civil court structure in Ireland. It should be read in conjunction with the

Enforcing judgments in cross-border disputes—flowchart

Enforcing judgments in cross-border disputes—flowchart This Flowchart considers how to enforce a judgment in a cross-border dispute within the EU. It only considers regulations applicable between EU Member States and therefore it does not consider any potential international conventions. In addition to the European procedures, the Flowchart also refers to the enforcement provisions of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 (Brussels I (recast)). Article 39 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 provides that a judgment given in an EU Member State which is

Discover our 31 Flowcharts on Resolution

Electronic communications: Universal Service Directive [Archived]

Electronic communications: Universal Service Directive [Archived] ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. This Practice Note relates to Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services as amended by Directive 2009/136/EC (Universal Service Directive). It is part of a series of Practice Notes on core elements of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications. In the EU, the provision of electronic communications networks and services in each Member State is governed by a common regulatory framework which originally comprised five directives (the Framework). The objective of the Framework was to establish a harmonised framework for the regulation of electronic communications networks and services throughout the EU. In December 2018, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast) (the European Electronic Communications Code) was published in the Official Journal of the EU and came into force three days after publication. The European Electronic Communications Code...

LCAM Expedited Arbitration Rules (2022)

LCAM Expedited Arbitration Rules (2022) Background Several arbitral institutions and indeed even the UNCITRAL have in recent years developed expedited or fast track rules for low value disputes and for parties looking to avoid a lengthy arbitration process. Typically, these rules provide for the arbitral process to be conducted on a truncated timeline with a final award to be rendered within three or six months of commencement. For a general discussion on Expedited Rules, see Practice Note: Expedited (aka fast-track) arbitration. This note considers LCAM’s Expedited Arbitration Rules (the Expedited Rules), which have been in force since 1 September 2022, see Practice Note: LCIA (2020)—guidance on creation of a fast-track procedure. As Article 1.2 of the Expedited Rules state, they entail ‘…a complete stand-alone documents-only procedure for the resolution of disputes through arbitration by a sole arbitrator appointed by LCAM. The procedure administered by LCAM under the Rules is intended to be simple, expedited and cost effective’. The LCAM Expedited Rules stand out from the crowd in the following...

Discover our 4681 Practice Notes on Resolution

Finance provisions—joint venture shareholders’ agreement

ALTERNATIVE 1: PROVISION FOR FUTURE LOANS BY SHAREHOLDERS Clause 1 Insert a new definition as follows (if not already included): Respective Proportion means, in relation to a Shareholder, the proportion which the number of Shares held by that Shareholder bears to the total number of issued Shares of the Company; Replace clause 9.3 with the following new clauses 9.3 and 9.4: 9.3 In the event that, at any time during the term of this Agreement, any such borrowings are not available or do not satisfy the working capital requirements of the Company as determined by the Board, each of the Shareholders, when requested from time to time, lend to the Company its Respective Proportion of the amount specified by the...

Transition schedule

Transition schedule Schedule—Transition 1 Introduction 1.1 This Schedule describes how the Services will be transferred from the Customer to the Supplier on or before the scheduled Service Commencement Date . 1.2 It sets out the responsibilities of each party, management and reporting processes and the consequences of any delays or failures in the delivery of the Transition activities. 2 Transition 2.1 From the Effective Date, the Supplier shall: 2.1.1 begin Transition of the Services in accordance with the Transition Plan contained in the Annex to this Schedule; 2.1.2 ensure that each Milestone is completed on or before the Milestone Date; and 2.1.3 take any other action or perform any other services that are necessary to ensure that the Services are ready to be provided on or before the Service Commencement Date notwithstanding that such actions or services may not be expressly set out in the Transition Plan. 2.2 The Supplier shall be responsible for the overall management of Transition and shall identify and resolve, or assist the Customer in the...

Dive into our 1231 Precedents related to Resolution

Where a worker’s pay is not in compliance with National Minimum Wage (NMW) rates, can the worker bring a claim in the employment tribunal and also make a complaint to HMRC for enforcement proceedings against their employer? If the worker’s claim involves a cause of action in addition to their claim for statutory underpayment of wages, would they be able to pursue the claim for underpayment separately via HMRC enforcement, and proceed just with their employment tribunal claim in respect of the other, non-NMW-related, claim(s)?

Where a worker’s pay is not in compliance with National Minimum Wage (NMW) rates, can the worker bring a claim in the employment tribunal and also make a complaint to HMRC for enforcement proceedings against their employer? If the worker’s claim involves a cause of action in addition to their claim for statutory underpayment of wages, would they be able to pursue the claim for underpayment separately via HMRC enforcement, and proceed just with their employment tribunal claim in respect of the other, non-NMW-related, claim(s)? If a worker has not been paid the national minimum wage: • the worker can enforce their entitlement by way of their contract by making a claim for breach of contract or a claim for unlawful deduction from wages • HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) can enforce the worker's entitlement by issuing a notice of underpayment or suing on the worker's behalf For further information, see Practice Note: National minimum wage, in particular the main sections dealing with Consequences of failure to pay and Enforcement...

What will be the applicable limitation period where a settlement agreement is secured by way of a charging order and the debtor under the agreement subsequently defaults on repayment of the debt, which entitles the creditor to immediate repayment of the whole sum, and the creditor now wishes to enforce their charging order?

What will be the applicable limitation period where a settlement agreement is secured by way of a charging order and the debtor under the agreement subsequently defaults on repayment of the debt, which entitles the creditor to immediate repayment of the whole sum, and the creditor now wishes to enforce their charging order? We have assumed that reference is being made to a charging order. When seeking to enforce the charging order it would have been subject to the previous rules in this area (CPR 73 and CPR PD 73 were amended with the changes coming into force on 6 April 2016). Where such orders charge a beneficial interest under a trust in land, the charge is protected by means of a restriction under the Land Registration Act 2002. We also assume that the charging order was validly obtained. If seeking to apply for an order for sale to enforce a charging order made prior to 6 April 2016 you should still follow the regime set out in the amended...

See the 1927 Q&As about Resolution

Construction weekly highlights—30 January 2025

This week's edition of Construction weekly highlights includes analysis of cases where the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) found a ‘building safety risk’ which could lead to the making of a ‘building liability order’ under the Building Safety Act 2022 (381 Southwark Park Road v Click St Andrews), where the Court of Session enforced an adjudicator’s award following ‘Smash and Grab’ adjudication proceedings (ATG Services v Ogilvie), where the TCC gave valuable guidance on payment notices, pay less notices, and default payment notices (Placefirst v Car Construction), and where the Court of Appeal (CoA) dismissed an appeal related to the High Court’s calculation of damages where the claimant’s mitigation actions resulted in an increased benefit to the company, as well as the Cabinet Office’s update on the final preparations for the Procurement Act 2023 (PA 2023) coming into force on 24 February 2025, and publication by HM Treasury (HMT) of a working paper on its 10 Year Infrastructure Strategy.

Tax weekly highlights—30 January 2025

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) HMRC’s announcement of a consultation on draft MTT and DTT supplementary guidance, (2) News Analysis of the FTT’s decision in Bryan Robson Limited that consideration attributable to the exploitation of image rights was outside the scope of IR35, and (3) News Analysis of the UT’s decision on EIS disqualifying arrangements in Hoopla Animation Ltd.

Read the latest 16340 News articles on Resolution

Top

Trial

��Ӱ��

GLOSSARY