³ÉÈËÓ°Òô

Pregnancy and maternity discrimination

Produced by Tolley in association with
Employment Tax
Guidance

Pregnancy and maternity discrimination

Produced by Tolley in association with
Employment Tax
Guidance
imgtext

The Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) has separate provisions with regard to discrimination against a woman, which occurs because of her pregnancy or in connection with her maternity leave.

Discrimination because of pregnancy or pregnancy-related illness

The provisions regarding pregnancy and maternity discrimination define a period called the ‘protected period’. That period:

  1. •

    begins when the relevant woman’s pregnancy begins, and

  2. •

    ends:

    1. â—¦

      at the end of the maternity leave period, or when she returns to work after the pregnancy (if that is earlier), in cases where the woman has the right to maternity leave

    2. â—¦

      two weeks after the end of the pregnancy, if she does not have the right to maternity leave

A person discriminates against a woman if, in the protected period in relation to a pregnancy of hers, she is treated unfavourably:

  1. •

    because of the pregnancy

  2. •

    because of illness suffered by her as a result of it

EqA 2010, s 18(2)

Where a decision is taken during

Continue reading
To read the full Guidance note, register for a free trial of Tolley+â„¢
Emma Bartlett
Emma Bartlett

Partner at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP


Emma advises on all aspects of employment law including unlawful discrimination, whistleblowing, equal pay, unfair dismissal, breach of contract, restrictive covenants, protecting confidential information, boardroom disputes and claims under TUPE. She has experience in obtaining and executing interim injunctions for breach of confidentiality and/or restrictive covenant provisions. She also leads diversity issues for Charles Russell Speechlys employment team.   With a strong record in negotiating and resolving complex employment disputes, Emma is considered a skilled deal broker. She is a specialist in contentious discrimination matters and has significant experience in handling high value contentious claims for employers and senior individuals. Emma acts for employers, employees and trade unions. Her client base is broad, both in terms of the range of work and the sectors in which they operate. Amongst these clients are a number of growing, dynamic businesses (including UK start-ups), as well as long established financial institutions, and senior executives.   Emma speaks regularly on diversity issues, edits the diversity sections of Lawtel Employment Precedents and Company Policy Documents and certain diversity sections of Tolley Guidance Employment Tax online, and regularly contributes to article in HR and legal publications as well as comments in the national press on diversity issues.   Experience Successfully defended a tribunal claim of race and religious discrimination against a household name private members club. Added complications arose as the matter was reported in the press before judgment was given. An appeal to the Employment Appeals Tribunal was rejected. Advised and represented a large London retailer in relation to a multi-discrimination employment tribunal complaint (direct, indirect, victimisation and harassment based on race and religion). The claim was complicated by the variety of allegations and the worker's status; there were three preliminary hearings before a full merits hearing was listed. There were also four named Respondents to the claim. Successfully settled the action for a nominal sum, with agreement that all allegations were retracted and not repeated despite the action continuing against the other Respondents. Advised and negotiated service agreements for the senior management team of the seller on a multimillion pound share sale of a UK business. A major legal victory for a pilot employed by a household name airline, in a landmark case against the airline for indirect age discrimination. The decision has industry-wide ramifications for airlines and other organisations which provide a combination of long-term permanent health insurance or similar income protection payments via third party and self-insurance.

Powered by
  • 14 Sep 2022 10:34

Popular Articles

Residential property and capital allowances

Residential property and capital allowancesResidential property ― plant and machinery allowancesOrdinary residential property does not, and never has, qualified for capital allowances. as CAA 2001, s 35 denies plant allowances for expenditure incurred in providing plant or machinery for use in a

14 Jul 2020 17:14 | Produced by Tolley in association with Martin Wilson and Steven Bone Read more Read more

BPR ― trading and investment businesses

BPR ― trading and investment businessesIntroductionThe basic qualification rules for business property relief (BPR) are illustrated in the Flowchart ― trading or investment business for BPR purposes.For an overview of BPR, see the BPR overview guidance note.Relevant business propertyThe main

14 Jul 2020 15:36 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more

Holding companies ― VAT status of activities

Holding companies ― VAT status of activitiesThis guidance note examines how to determine the VAT status of a holding company’s activities. In particular, it looks at:•when a holding company is or is not in business•if a holding company is in business, whether its activities are exempt or taxableThe

14 Jul 2020 17:13 | Produced by Tolley Read more Read more