Part 6 Notice Procedures
Financial Services Act 2012 (2012 c 21) | Legislation

Part 6 Notice Procedures

26

(1)     Section 387 (warning notices) is amended as follows.

(2)     In subsection (1)(a), for “Authority†substitute “regulator giving the notice (“the regulator concernedâ€)â€.

(3)     After subsection (1) insert—

“(1A)     Where the PRA is the regulator concerned and the FCA proposes to refuse consent for the purposes of section 55F, 55I or 59 or to give conditional consent as mentioned in section 55F(5) or 55I(8), the warning notice given by the PRA must—

(a)     state that fact, and

(b)     give the reasons for the FCA's proposal.â€

(4)     In subsection (2)—

(a)     for “The warning†substitute “A warningâ€,

(b)     for “28 days†substitute “14 daysâ€, and

(c)     for “Authority†substitute “regulator concernedâ€.

(5)     In subsection (3), for “The Authority†substitute “The regulator concernedâ€.

(6)     After subsection (3) insert—

“(3A)     Where the PRA receives any representations in response to a warning notice given by it under section 55X(1) or (2) or 62(2) in a case falling within subsection (1A) it must—

(a)     if the representations are in writing, give a copy to the FCA, or

(b)     if they are not in writing and have not been given directly to the FCA by the person

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Schemes of arrangement—procedure

Schemes of arrangement—procedureProduced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice.This Practice Note looks at the detailed procedures to be followed to implement the acquisition by a buyer (offeror) of all the shares, or one or more classes of shares, in a company

LEXISNEXIS

Community order requirements

Community order requirementsThis Practice Note reflects the procedural code for sentencing offenders in England and Wales (Sentencing Code) that applies from 1 December 2020, as set out in Parts 2–13 of the Sentencing Act 2020 (SA 2020). For those considering whether the Sentencing Code applies to

LEXISNEXIS

Standard of care in professional negligence claims

Standard of care in professional negligence claimsThis Practice Note considers the standard of care in professional negligence claims, originally formulated in Bolam v Friern Hospital as being that of reasonable skill and care but now reconsidered following Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health. It

LEXISNEXIS

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent misrepresentation, unless the representor can prove they had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be true. If the representor had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be