"We couldn't do as good a job as we do without it. ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô gives us the security and confidence that we are best serving our clients because the information we are working on is the most accurate we can get"
Avensure
Access all documents on Rectification
Alteration of the Register of Title which involves the correction of a mistake and which prejudicially affects the title of a registered proprietor.
Rectification and alteration are provided for by Schedule 4 to the Land Registration Act 2002. Where rectification takes place, the registered proprietor may be entitled to an indemnity under Schedule 8 to the Land Registration Act 2002.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
Post-completion environmental issues (asset purchase)—checklist In an asset purchase transaction, the buyer acquires only those assets and assumes only those liabilities it wishes to acquire (as set out in the asset purchase agreement). Post-completion, the buyer may need to deal with specific environmental, health and safety (EHS) issues, revealed through due diligence. For example, the buyer may need to transfer or apply for a permit, join a packaging waste compliance scheme or improve health & safety documentation post completion. Common post completion EHS issues in asset purchase transactions include: • transferring environmental permits • checking whether the purchase has triggered any new obligations under environmental regimes, such as producer responsibility, energy efficiency and carbon schemes • addressing issues raised in any environmental audits and reports and any contract conditions • advising on environmental insurance and other risk mitigation strategies • obtaining reliance agreements or collateral warranties for reliance on environmental reports Transfer of environmental permits In an asset sale, the name of the operator/permit holder will change. As a result,...
Perfecting security in real estate finance transactions—checklist This Checklist sets out the steps which property lawyers need to take to perfect security in a real estate finance transaction. Real estate finance lenders will typically want to take a full security package over all of the assets relating to the real estate. A real estate lawyer in a multi-disciplinary team will likely be responsible for arranging or inputting into the following securities and documentation: • security over the land, rental income, insurance proceeds, development and construction and contractual rights • reviewing the management agreement and negotiating a duty of care agreement (although in a multi-disciplinary team, this is sometimes handled by the banking and finance lawyer) • dealing with completion undertakings and post completion registration of the legal charge at Companies House and HM Land Registry as well as giving third party notices regarding rent payment, notice of charge where necessary of assignment of contractual rights or warranties See Practice Notes: Security in real estate finance transactions, Taking security over land...
Discover our 31 Checklists on Rectification
UK design infringement action—flowchart This Flowchart provides an overview of a UK design infringement action. The specific right relied on could be one of the following design rights which coexist in the UK: • UK registered designs (including re-registered designs) • UK unregistered designs (sometimes referred to as ‘design right’) • supplementary unregistered designs For more information about these rights, see Practice Note: UK registered and unregistered designs. Stage 1—preparing to bring a claim and pre-action matters Claim preparation and pre-action matters—Practice Notes • Infringement of UK registered and unregistered designs • Design disputes—a practical guide • How to run an IP dispute • Copyright in designs • Types of dispute resolution • IP and mediation • IP and arbitration • UK Intellectual Property Office—mediation scheme • Disclosure scheme—when and where it applies Claim preparation and pre-action matters—Precedent • Disclosure Scheme timetable—checklist Claim preparation and pre-action matters—Forms • Application for injunction • Application notice • Notice of hearing of application Stage 2—Letter before action alleging infringement Letter before...
Handling data subject requests—flowchart The UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) provides a number of rights for data subjects, including providing a right of access to their personal data, rights to rectification, erasure, restriction of processing and data portability, a right to object to processing and a right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated decision making, including profiling. Data subjects can make a request to an organisation to exercise one or more of these rights at any time and there are strict time limits for complying with requests made. See Practice Note: How to handle data subject requests. This Flowchart maps out a process for handling data subject requests received under the UK GDPR. It reflects requirements in the UK GDPR together with guidance issued by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). It should be read in conjunction with Practice Note: How to handle data subject requests and the following detailed Flowcharts for handling requests under specific data subject rights: • Evaluating a data subject...
Discover our 6 Flowcharts on Rectification
Rectification is an equitable remedy by which the court can correct an error of expression where a written document does not match the parties' intention. It is available only in relation to written contracts and other documents. An oral agreement cannot be rectified. This Practice Note explains the principles applicable in considering whether an error can be corrected by interpretation rather than rectification and the elements of a claim for rectification for mutual or common mistake. For more information in respect of a mistake made by one party, see Practice Note: Rectification—unilateral mistake.Interpretation or rectification?The starting point in considering a claim for the correction of an error is to ask whether the error can be solved by means of interpretation rather than rectification. At common law, rectification is not available and so the only way in which an error of expression can be corrected at common law is by applying the ordinary rules of interpretation. As a matter of principle, the equitable remedy of rectification ought not to be granted...
Rectification is an equitable remedy by which the court can correct an error of expression where a written document does not match the parties' intention. It is only available for written contracts and other documents (not oral agreements). This Practice Note explains when a solicitor is under a duty to point out unilateral drafting errors and when a unilateral mistake is simply an error of judgment.For rectification for common mistake, see Practice Note: Rectification—mutual mistake.When is rectification available?Rectification for unilateral mistake is available where one party makes a mistake in a document, the other party is aware of the error in their favour, and unconscionably takes advantage of it. Three elements must be present:•by the claimant’s mistake the agreement did not give effect to their subjective intention at the time of execution•there was no mistake by the defendant•the defendant was aware of the claimant’s mistake at the time of execution, and there was unconscionable behaviour by inducing execution or by standing by and allowing itIn Littman v Aspen Oil there...
Discover our 602 Practice Notes on Rectification
Produced in partnership with ELM Law 1 Asbestos in buildings 1.1 As soon as reasonably practicable after the Completion Date the Seller and the Buyer must jointly instruct a UKAS accredited or ABICS certified asbestos surveyor to: 1.1.1 undertake an asbestos management survey at the Property (which will also form an asbestos register) to assess what asbestos remedial work if any is required to make the Property compliant with the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012, SI 2012/632; and 1.1.2 prepare an asbestos management plan for the Property. ...
Lexcel post-assessment email to all staff Dear All We have completed our recent Lexcel assessment. We would like to thank you all for your co-operation especially those who were interviewed by the assessor. [If there are any major non-compliances then give details and what rectification is required and explain in more detail if a revisit is required] [There were some minor non-compliances highlighted by the assessor and corrective action is required. We will contact those responsible direct to complete the rectification.] The
Dive into our 167 Precedents related to Rectification
Instead of rectification, can the Chartbrook principle (Chartbrook v Persimmon) be used to correct a drafting error in a contract that was intended to have a clause providing for auto-renewal at the end of the contract, but which contains a drafting error which renders the auto-renewal clause nonsensical? Rectification is an equitable remedy aimed at amending a document to accord with the intention of the parties. Parties to a contract may have had a common intention or understanding when they drew up their contract as to what it meant but, somehow, that meaning has not been reflected in the drafting, ie it is different from the objective meaning of the contractual document as ascertained in accordance with the rules of contract interpretation. Alternatively, a mistake may be able to be corrected by means of construction ie, seeking a declaration of the court as to the meaning of the relevant clause, rather than by applying for rectification. In Investors Compensation Scheme v West Bromwich Building Society, Lord Hoffmann set out...
Where the decree absolute/final order reflects the names of the parties as per the marriage certificate, but the marriage certificate itself is incorrect, can the decree absolute/final order be amended without seeking to amend the original marriage certificate? The parties were married abroad It is possible for the court to correct an irregularity in a final divorce order. This power is provided for by the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, 29.16 (the slip rule) or FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, 4.1(6) (power to vary or revoke). An application under the slip rule may be made without notice, but is perhaps better suited to minor corrections, for example, a spelling mismatch between the marriage certificate and the final order. It is suggested that in the circumstances outlined in the question an application on notice adopting the FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, Pt 18 procedure invoking FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, 4.1(6) may be more appropriate. In X v Y (Divorce: Rectification of Decrees), McFarlane P relied on this power to...
See the 162 Q&As about Rectification
This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) HMRC’s announcement of a consultation on draft MTT and DTT supplementary guidance, (2) News Analysis of the FTT’s decision in Bryan Robson Limited that consideration attributable to the exploitation of image rights was outside the scope of IR35, and (3) News Analysis of the UT’s decision on EIS disqualifying arrangements in Hoopla Animation Ltd.
This edition of Employment weekly highlights includes: (1) the updated Employment Rights Bill, (2) an employment tribunal decision finding that Addison Lee drivers were workers and holding that the two-year backstop on unlawful deduction claims is unlawful, (3) the Court of Appeal’s declaration that section 4(2)(a) of the State Immunity Act 1978 is incompatible with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, (4) regulations increasing the annual data protection fees payable to the Information Commissioner, (5) analysis by Katie Farmer of Trowers & Hamlins of an EAT decision that a claim for unpaid holiday pay vests in the claimant’s trustee in bankruptcy, and awarding ‘interest-like’ compensation for the payment delay, (6) the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary guidance on communicating with employment tribunals, (7) new Employment Tribunal Presidential Guidance on taking oral evidence from persons located abroad, (8) the IRLR Highlights for February 2025, (9) dates for your diary, and (10) other news items of interest to employment practitioners.
Read the latest 993 News articles on Rectification
**Trials are provided to all ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234