Arbitration Definition

See All Glossary Terms

Related Glossary Terms

GLOSSARY

/ɑː��ɪˈ�ٰ��ɪʃ(ə)��/

Published by a ��Ӱ�� Commercial expert

What does Arbitration mean?

Generally, a private form of final and binding dispute resolution by an appointed arbitral tribunal acting in a quasi-judicial manner. Arbitration is, generally, founded on party agreement (the arbitration agreement), and regulated and enforced by national courts.

Unlike other forms of alternative dispute resolution, arbitration is governed by statute: Arbitration Act 1996.

Commercial

Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution in which parties to a dispute submit to the binding decision of a person acting in a judicial manner in private, rather than to a court of law.

Unlike other forms of alternative dispute resolution, arbitration is governed by statute: the Arbitration Act 1996.

Dispute Resolution

Unlike other forms of alternative dispute resolution, arbitration is governed by statute: Arbitration Act 1996.

View the related checklists about Arbitration

MVNO agreement—checklist

MVNO agreement—checklist This Checklist covers some of the main provisions to be included in a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) agreement under which a mobile network operator supplier will provide wholesale access services to an MVNO for resale to its own retail customers. It covers some of the main provisions that are specific to an agreement of this kind. See also the Precedent: MVNO agreement. In this Checklist, the following definitions are used: • Agreement—means the MVNO agreement between the MVNO and the Supplier for the provision of the Services • End-User—means a customer of the MVNO • IPR—means intellectual property rights • MVNO—means mobile virtual network operator, the customer in the Agreement • Services—means the wholesale network services being provided to the MVNO by the Supplier • Supplier—means the mobile network operator providing network services to the MVNO The third column can be used to record observations or comments as the Checklist is worked through. Checklist Further information Notes (if any) General terms and conditions ☐ Consider duration....

Governing law and jurisdiction clauses in commercial contracts―checklist

Governing law and jurisdiction clauses in commercial contracts―checklist This Checklist of resources sets out some of the issues when considering governing law and jurisdiction in the context of commercial contracts. Governing law and jurisdiction clauses are categorised as boilerplate clauses in an agreement. For more information on boilerplate clauses, see: Boilerplate clauses—overview. For details about the role of boilerplate clauses and approaches to reviewing and drafting common boilerplate clauses, see Practice Note: The role of boilerplate. A governing law clause (also known as an applicable law clause) is used to allow the parties to specify the substantive law that will apply to the interpretation of an agreement and, in the event of a dispute, in relation to it. For an example of a governing law clause, see Precedent: Governing law clause. The applicable law clause in a contract will usually be set out alongside a jurisdiction clause. It is important to note that jurisdiction and governing law are separate issues. A jurisdiction clause is necessary to allow the parties to...

UK design infringement action—flowchart

UK design infringement action—flowchart This Flowchart provides an overview of a UK design infringement action. The specific right relied on could be one of the following design rights which coexist in the UK: • UK registered designs (including re-registered designs) • UK unregistered designs (sometimes referred to as ‘design right’) • supplementary unregistered designs For more information about these rights, see Practice Note: UK registered and unregistered designs. Stage 1—preparing to bring a claim and pre-action matters Claim preparation and pre-action matters—Practice Notes • Infringement of UK registered and unregistered designs • Design disputes—a practical guide • How to run an IP dispute • Copyright in designs • Types of dispute resolution • IP and mediation • IP and arbitration • UK Intellectual Property Office—mediation scheme • Disclosure scheme—when and where it applies Claim preparation and pre-action matters—Precedent • Timetable for disclosure—Business and Property Courts disclosure pilot Claim preparation and pre-action matters—Forms • Application for injunction • Application notice • Notice of hearing of application Stage 2—Letter before action...

Passing off—flowchart

Passing off—flowchart Passing off action Passing off is a common law action that is used to protect unregistered trade mark rights in the UK. The stages of the Flowchart cover establishing a claim for passing off covering: • the three essential elements of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage • sending a letter of claim, issuing proceedings and applying for an injunction • commencing proceedings in the general Intellectual Property List or the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court sub-list in the Business and Property Court, in the Chancery Division at the High Court • case management including allocation, the case management conference and directions • disclosure and evidence including inspection, additional disclosure and survey evidence • trial preparation and post-trial activities such as election between damages or an account of profits • applications to appeal Stage 1—preparing to bring a claim and pre-action matters Claim preparation and pre-action matters—Practice Notes • Passing off—goodwill, misrepresentation and damage • Trade mark and passing off disputes—a practical guide • How to run an IP dispute...

Differences between adjudication and other forms of dispute resolution

This Practice Note identifies some of the key differences between adjudication and litigation, arbitration, mediation and expert determination.LitigationAdjudication is a quick method of settling disputes on a provisional interim basis—it is binding until finally resolved by arbitration, litigation or agreement. The requirements of natural justice that are crucial in litigation are important in adjudication. However, in the adjudication context, the rules of natural justice are secondary to the requirement that the adjudicator must reach a decision in a very limited period. See Practice Note: Breach of natural justice in adjudication.ConfidentialityIn litigation the court’s judgment is made public. Adjudicator’s decisions rarely make it into the public domain due to their lack of authority in other proceedings. In addition, the parties to adjudication can enter into a confidentiality agreement.ProcedureLitigation is regulated by the Civil Procedure Rules. The relevant legislation in relation to adjudication (governing. among other things, its timescales and procedure) is Part II of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1998 and, if applicable, the Scheme for Construction Contracts.Legal costs...

Arbitration procedure—pursuant to the Arbitration Act 1996

Arbitration under the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) is an ad-hoc procedure not administered by an institution. It is for the tribunal (once appointed) to control the arbitration and, subject to the parties’ agreement, to set and drive the procedure of the arbitration. For an overview of the structure of arbitration proceedings, see Practice Note: A quick guide to the arbitration process, which sets out the 'general' structure that an arbitration will follow. Note, however, that the structure of the arbitration will be influenced by the legal background of the counsel and tribunal involved—an English-seated arbitration in front of an English arbitrator with parties represented by English counsel is likely to follow the format of English litigation. However, where American and English counsels appear infront of a South-American arbitrator, the procedure may well be different and influenced by its participants (though clearly directed by the tribunal).AA 1996 procedureSections 33–41 of AA 1996 are under the heading ‘the arbitral proceedings’. However, in practice, AA 1996 (deliberately) contains no set structure for...

Discover our 1800 Practice Notes on Arbitration

Short-form facility agreement (term loan): single company borrower—bilateral—unsecured

Short-form facility agreement (term loan): single company borrower—bilateral—unsecured Facility agreement This Agreement is made on [date] Parties 1 [insert name of Borrower], a company incorporated in England and Wales with registered number [insert company number] whose registered office is at [insert address] (the Borrower); and 2 [insert name of Lender], of [insert address] (the Lender). It is agreed as follows: 1 Definitions and interpretation 1.1 In this Agreement, unless otherwise provided: Business Day • means a day, other than a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday, on which banks are open for business in London; Commitment • means £[•] ([•] Sterling) minus any amount reduced or cancelled in accordance with this Agreement; Commitment Period • means the period commencing on the date of this Agreement to and including [•]; Default • means an event that with the giving of notice, lapse of time or other applicable condition would be an Event of Default under Clause 16; Drawdown • means [the OR a] utilisation of the...

Part 26A restructuring plan for SMEs

Part 26A restructuring plan for SMEs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES COMPANIES LIST (CHD) IN THE MATTER OF [insert name of the Company] AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2006 BETWEEN [insert name of the Company] and THE PLAN CREDITORS [AND MEMBERS] (as defined herein) RESTRUCTURING PLAN (under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006) DATED [insert date] RECITALS The Company (A) [Insert name of the Company] is a [private] limited company, incorporated in [England and Wales] with company number [insert company number] and office at [insert address] (the Company) Purpose of the Restructuring Plan (B) The purpose of this Restructuring Plan is to affect a compromise and arrangement between: [(i)] the Company and the Plan Creditors; [and (ii) the Company and the Members], in order to eliminate, reduce or prevent, or mitigate the effect of financial difficulties encountered [or likely to be encountered] by the Company that are affecting, or will...

Dive into our 589 Precedents related to Arbitration

In an arbitration under the London Court of International Arbitration Rules 2014 (LCIA Rules 2014), how does a respondent learn of the date of commencement of the arbitration? Does that date correspond to the date on which the LCIA notifies the respondent of its receipt of the request for arbitration and of the registration fee?

In an arbitration under the London Court of International Arbitration Rules 2014 (LCIA Rules 2014), how does a respondent learn of the date of commencement of the arbitration? Does that date correspond to the date on which the LCIA notifies the respondent of its receipt of the request for arbitration and of the registration fee? The date of commencement of an arbitration under the London Court of International Arbitration Rules 2014 An arbitration in the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) is commenced by the claimant delivering the request for arbitration to the LCIA Registrar (the Registrar) (LCIA, Art 1). As this Q&A has identified, the date of commencement of an LCIA arbitration is the date of receipt of the request by the Registrar, subject to the actual receipt of the registration fee as provided by LCIA, Art 1.4. A respondent will learn of the date of the commencement from the LCIA secretariat. As a matter of practice, the LCIA secretariat will notify all parties simultaneously of...

In light of coronavirus (COVID-19), is arbitration preferable over litigation as a method of dispute resolution given the increased flexibility inherent in arbitration proceedings generally?

In light of coronavirus (COVID-19), is arbitration preferable over litigation as a method of dispute resolution given the increased flexibility inherent in arbitration proceedings generally? Clare Ambrose, Twenty Essex This is a ‘once in a generation’ challenge. We will see over the next months how the court system and the arbitration community respond. Arbitration is more flexible, and it is already common for directions to be made electronically, CMCs to be heard by telephone and disputes to be resolved by documents only. It is hoped that arbitration will be agile to meet the needs of parties. If so, and virtual hearings (or even partially virtual hearings) start to work well, then they will become an attractive feature. Corporations weathering this crisis will be mindful of resilience for the next one. Arbitration will be attractive if it is seen to work in times of crisis. If it becomes cheaper and more sustainable too then that must be a bonus. Hamish Lal, Akin Gump The tangible and significant impacts of...

See the 185 Q&As about Arbitration

HKIAC establishes Beijing Representative Office

The Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) has announced the establishment of its Beijing Representative Office, marking a significant milestone as the first offshore arbitration institution to set up in Beijing. Set to open on 16 December 2024, the new office will complement HKIAC's existing Shanghai presence, focusing on capacity-building, training, and fostering exchanges within China's arbitration community. The move builds on HKIAC's strong reputation in China-related arbitrations, with 40% of its cases involving Mainland Chinese parties. HKIAC's diverse governance structure and bilingual capabilities position it well to serve both Chinese and international clients. This expansion aims to further HKIAC's role in advancing international arbitration by bridging Chinese and global practitioners as Beijing develops as an international dispute resolution centre.

BCLP publishes 2024 international arbitration survey

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) has published its 2024 International Arbitration Survey, focusing on the challenges posed by corruption in arbitration proceedings. The survey reveals that while 82% of respondents are confident in the arbitration process's ability to handle corruption issues, 64% express concern about potential abuse of the arbitral process in such cases. Notably, 67% of respondents favour introducing transparency rules for commercial arbitrations involving states or state-owned entities. The survey also indicates strong support for requiring 'clear and cogent' evidence for corruption allegations, and a majority advocate for additional best practice guidelines in arbitrations involving corruption allegations. These findings underscore the complex interplay between confidentiality, transparency, and procedural integrity in arbitrations dealing with corruption issues.

Read the latest 8412 News articles on Arbitration

Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

Case studies

"We couldn't do as good a job as we do without it. ��Ӱ�� gives us the security and confidence that we are best serving our clients because the information we are working on is the most accurate we can get"

Avensure

Access all documents on Arbitration

GET ACCESS NOW

Top

Trial

��Ӱ��

GLOSSARY