Stop settling for slow: What lawyers really want from legal drafting solutions

Stop settling for slow: What lawyers really want from legal drafting solutions

There鈥檚 no sugar-coating it鈥攎any law firms are still bogged down by sluggish systems and outdated processes. From legal research to drafting contracts, the daily work of lawyers is often slowed by clunky tools and workflows that haven鈥檛 kept pace with the rest of the business world.

More than one in three lawyers say their firm is adequate, slow or very slow at delivering legal work. That鈥檚 a problem. Because while clients are demanding more personalised services, faster turnarounds, and better communication, many firms are still wrestling with inefficient drafting tools and broken knowledge flows.

But what exactly do lawyers want from their drafting solutions? A recent survey by 成人影音 offers insight into the top features that practitioners across private practice and in-house roles say would make a real difference to how they work.

The pain of a slow drafting process

Nearly half (45%) of lawyers surveyed said their drafting and document review processes were 鈥渁dequate, slow or very slow.鈥 That鈥檚 a major issue, considering how central these tasks are to legal work.

Tony Randle, Partner for Client Tech & Service Improvement at Shoosmiths, says their firm took a strategic view: 鈥淲e identified that building legal tech, including AI, into legal workflows common to most of our practice areas will deliver the greatest positive benefits.鈥 In short, improving drafting workflows isn鈥檛 just a tech upgrade鈥攊t鈥檚 a performance upgrade.

The challenge is finding tools that actually make a difference, rather than simply digitising old inefficiencies. As H茅lder Santos of Bird & Bird notes, 鈥淭he biggest areas for innovation are to the client experience, workflow optimisation, and legal drafting.鈥

Let鈥檚 focus on that last piece鈥攄rafting.

What lawyers want from their drafting tools

We asked lawyers to choose the three features they consider most important in a legal drafting solution. Here鈥檚 what stood out:

  • Works inside Microsoft Word (41%)
    Unsurprisingly, Word remains the drafting environment of choice for most lawyers. Any tool that doesn鈥檛 integrate seamlessly into Word is likely to be met with resistance. Lawyers don鈥檛 want to relearn how to draft鈥攖hey want to enhance what they鈥檙e already doing.

  • Comprehensive clause libraries (37%)
    Lawyers want reliable, pre-approved language they can drop into documents without reinventing the wheel. Clause libraries save time, reduce risk, and ensure consistency across practice groups.

  • Access to up-to-date legal research (36%)
    Whether you're drafting a contract or writing a letter of advice, being able to verify legal positions in real-time is critical. Lawyers want drafting tools that connect to legal research databases and ensure the information they use is accurate and current.

  • Proof-reading and sense checking (28%)
    Lawyers are detail-obsessed by nature. But having software that flags stylistic issues, ambiguous wording, or inconsistencies can save valuable time鈥攁nd prevent embarrassment.

  • Automated contract management (24%)
    Templates with pre-set clauses are no longer a 鈥渘ice to have.鈥 They鈥檙e becoming a standard expectation, particularly for high-volume practices such as commercial contracts or employment law.

Other popular features included:

  • User-friendly interface (22%)

  • Robust data security (18%)

  • E-signature capabilities (18%)

  • Compliance review automation (19%)

  • Real-time collaboration (14%)

  • DMS integration (14%)

Interestingly, fewer than 4% of lawyers said they would only ever create legal documents manually, showing a clear shift in mindset: legal tech is no longer the future鈥攊t鈥檚 the present.

Culture eats software for breakfast

Of course, technology alone doesn鈥檛 solve drafting problems. Culture, structure, and leadership matter just as much.

Darren Mitchell, COO at Simmons & Simmons, believes knowledge management is at the heart of change: 鈥淚t鈥檚 key for driving how we structure and use core documents to enable the effective use of AI-powered tools.鈥 If you鈥檙e not managing your clauses, templates, and knowledge centrally, you鈥檙e missing a major opportunity.

Nick West, Chief Strategy Officer at Mishcon de Reya, echoes this sentiment: 鈥淭he innovation activities of a legal department should closely align with the organisation鈥檚 current business goals鈥 At different times, one鈥檚 efforts might be weighted more towards one type of innovation in favour of another.鈥

That could mean focusing on building a better "legal front door" to handle internal requests, or driving productivity in contracting workflows. The key is knowing what matters most to your firm or department鈥攁nd backing the right tools to deliver impact.

Time to rethink the role of drafting

Legal drafting is more than just a transactional task. It鈥檚 where lawyers think, strategise, and deliver advice. But too often, it becomes a repetitive administrative burden.

By adopting smarter drafting solutions, lawyers can reclaim their time and focus on high-value work鈥攁nalysing risk, advising clients, negotiating better outcomes. And with tools like Lexis+ AI and Lexis+ Create now offering deep Word integration, access to trusted research, and AI-powered clause suggestions, the possibilities for transformation are better than ever.

Innovation with intention

There鈥檚 no shortage of shiny tech. But real innovation happens when law firms and legal teams take a deliberate approach鈥攊dentifying the pain points that drag performance down and applying solutions with surgical precision.

Tony Randle puts it best: 鈥淢apping out the areas that are going to have the biggest positive impact across the firm or legal team is the first step.鈥

Don鈥檛 settle for sluggish drafting. Whether you鈥檙e a private practice partner, a junior associate, or an in-house counsel, now is the time to upgrade your toolkit鈥攁nd accelerate the work that matters.


Latest Articles: