Remuneration questioned by investors at recent AGMs

Remuneration questioned by investors at recent AGMs

As company accounts come under closer scrutiny amid talk of recession, shareholders continue to take the opportunity at company AGMs to express disapproval with executive pay.

Scapa Group saw significant opposition to its remuneration report and its request to disapply pre-emption rights at its on 7 August 2020.

On 12 February, the AIM 50 company posted a trading update ahead of its financial year end on 31 March 2020, reporting that revenue had decreased from £311.8m in 2019 to around £306m and that the loss of a significant contract with ConvaTec had resulted in a significant decrease in trading profit to approximately £28m. Once the news hit the market, Scapa’s share price dropped from 272 pence per share to 188 pence, its lowest in almost five years.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic had a further effect on the share price of the adhesive and wound-care specialist, which dipped down as low as 83.2 pence in July. In May, the company cancelled its dividend and carried out a cashbox placing for 19.99% of the company’s share capital to strengthen the group’s balance sheet and provide flexibility to support future growth initiatives post-COVID-19. The move followed guidance from the Pre-Emption Group released in April, recommending that during the COVID-19 crisis, investors consider supporting non pre-emptive fundraisings of up to 20% of a company’s issued share capital on a temporary basis.

Notwithstanding its financial difficulties, Scapa announced in its that it had failed to comply with a number of provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code in relation to remuneration, stating that ‘due to the changes in the Remuneration Committee Chairman during the year, a review of workforce remuneration and related policies to ensure alignment of incentives and rewards with the Company culture was not undertaken.’

A combination of poor results, a cancelled dividend and a cash call do not appear to have sat well with a failure to address the increasingly controversial matter of remuneration. Although Scapa posted in advance of its AGM that results for the first quarter of the current financial year had exceeded its COVID-19 scenario plan, 23.86% of shareholders voted against the company’s remuneration report and 21.4% voted against disapplying pre-emption rights in relation to acquisitions and special investments.

In its response to the voting results, Scapa stated ‘the Board notes that Resolutions 2 and 13 were passed with more than 20% of votes cast against them. In advance of the AGM, the Board developed a clear understanding of the concerns raised by shareholders on each of these resolutions. [The Board] will continue to consult and engage with shareholders in order to foster further understanding of their expectations and views. The outcome of these engagements will be detailed in next year's Annual Report and Accounts.’

Market Tracker research into AGM voting since 1 January 2020 indicates that the resolutions most likely to attract significant no votes are the remuneration report, remuneration policy and the re-election/election of a director. This month has also seen significant opposition in line with this at two FTSE 250 companies. Investec plc experienced on both its remuneration report and remuneration policy following a weak financial year which it attributed to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic combined with ‘Brexit-related uncertainties in the UK, geo-political tensions and persistent economic weakness in South Africa.’ The company also cancelled its dividend. Nevertheless, the opposition to the remuneration policy came as a surprise considering that the company had been consulting on this with shareholders since 2018, a point that it noted in its response to the . Meanwhile, a significant number of shareholders at Sirius Real Estate Limited voted against the company’s remuneration policy and director re-election and FTSE 100 company JD sports saw significant shareholder opposition to its remuneration policy and report. For more on this story see: JD’s lack of sportsmanship leads to significant no votes


Related Articles:
Latest Articles:
About the author:

Market Tracker is a unique service for corporate lawyers housed within Lexis®PSL Corporate. It features a powerful transaction data analysis tool for accessing, analysing and comparing the specific features of corporate transactions, with a comprehensive and searchable library of deal documentation across 14 different deal types. The Market Tracker product also includes news and analysis of key corporate deals and activity and in-depth analysis of recent trends in corporate transactions.Â